Servant
Leadership
Rev.
Dr. Tom Sorenson, Pastor
November
5, 2017
Scripture:
Micah 3:5-12; Matthew 23:1-12
Let us pray: May the words of my mouth and the meditations of all of
our hearts be acceptable in your sight O God, our strength and our
redeemer. Amen.
It’s a phrase we hear over and over again in the ministry business.
“Servant Leadership.” It’s what we’re taught in seminary, or
at least in any seminary worth its salt. We ordained folk are all
supposed to be “servant leaders.” When you think about it,
though, the phrase doesn’t make much sense. The two words seem to
contradict each other. The first word of the phrase, servant, refers
to someone who is at the beck and call of another. The servant does
only what the master directs the servant to do. A servant is an
employee who simply performs the duties specified in her job
description. She performs those duties only as her employer directs,
otherwise she gets fired. A servant is a follower not a leader.
Clever servants may be able to manipulate their employer at times,
but that’s not their job. Their job is to receive directions and
follow them.
A leader is something quite different, isn’t she. A leader leads. A
leader doesn’t follow orders. A leader may in fact give orders. One
extreme example of leadership is military leadership. An officer in
charge of a group of soldiers, be it a platoon or a division, gives
orders. Those who receive the orders obey them, or at least they’re
supposed to. Even in a less tightly structured environment than the
military a leader directs. She sets a course. She points the way. She
gets others to follower her lead, probably not so much by giving
orders as by encouragement and example. In any event, as we commonly
understand the term a leader is not the servant of those whom she
leads. She is precisely their leader.
So what can “servant leadership” possibly mean? Isn’t that
phrase a hopeless contradiction in terms? It sure sounds like one,
but actually it isn’t. At least it isn’t necessarily a hopeless
contradiction in terms. We can get started toward an understanding of
how it isn’t a contradiction in terms by considering a few lines
from the two scripture passages we just heard. I’ll start with
Micah. The eighth century BCE prophet Micah is vociferously
condemning the leaders of the Hebrew people for doing leadership all
wrong. He thunders: “Her leaders judge for a bribe, her priests
teach for a price, and her prophets tell fortunes for money.” I’ve
told some of you before that Micah’s line “her priests teach for
a price” slaps me in the face every time I read or hear it. That’s
because there is a built in tension in the work of a church pastor.
We all depend on the compensation package we receive from the church
we serve. Most of the time at least we don’t want to get fired
(although sometimes we may be willing to be fired, or at least to
risk being fired, in order to speak the truth as we know it). So we
teach for a price. We preach for a price. I know that some of you
don’t think I’ve pulled my punches anywhere near enough here; but
believe me, I’ve pulled them plenty. I’ve never given you a
sermon expressly on what we call the Open and Affirming movement,
though you badly need to hear one. I told you my convictions about
Donald Trump as President, but since I did that I don’t think I’ve
mentioned him by name even once in a sermon. I have preached a little
bit on Christian nonviolence, but I’ve never preached it as
strongly as I feel called to preach it. So yes, I teach for a price.
I preach for a price. And Micah condemns the leaders of ancient
Israel, and me, for doing it.
Then there’s our passage from Matthew. In that passage Jesus
condemns people whom the text calls “the teachers of the law and
the Pharisees” for not practicing what they preach. They exercise
their positions of leadership, he says, only to puff themselves up
and to get people at least to pretend to respect them. They place
burdens on the people that they themselves will not bear. They make a
show of the artifacts of piety—that’s what the line about
phylacteries and fringes is about. They revel in being called by the
honorable title Rabbi. For these people their leadership is all about
themselves, not about they people they are called to lead.
The people that both our Micah and our Matthew passages condemn are
leaders, but they certainly are not “servant leaders.” They
exercise leadership, but they do it all wrong. They do it to enrich
themselves. They do it for the prestige of their office, and both the
ancient prophet Micah and the more recent prophet Jesus blast them
for it. Clearly both of these passages demand a different kind of
leadership than the leadership these passages condemn.
But what kind of leadership do they have in mind that’s better than
the leadership they condemn? Jesus gives us the answer to that
question right at the end of the passage we heard. He says: “For
whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself
will be exalted.” Elsewhere in Matthew he says “The last will be
first, and the first will be last.” Matthew 20:30 In both passages
Jesus is teaching servant leadership, and in those passages we get a
good picture of what the “servant” part of that phrase actually
means.
It means that true Christian leadership is never done primarily for
the benefit of the leader. Yes, the people being led may pay the
leader a salary and other compensation; but the leader must always
understand that he leads not to benefit himself but to benefit the
people he leads. He may be in a position of leadership, but he must
always lead only for the benefit of those whose leader he supposedly
is. I was taught in seminary, and I strongly believe, that if you’re
going into pastoral ministry because you need an ego boost, or
because you need people to build you up, or because your ego demands
that it be propped up by being the one up front the people are
looking at and listening to, get out. Get out now. Don’t even think
about taking a call to a church. Why? Because you don’t get what
pastoral leadership is really about. You’re going into church
leadership for all the wrong reasons, and that way lies only trouble.
None of you were at my ordination service back in 2002, but at that
service the Rev. Phyllis Anderson gave the sermon. She was Associate
Dean of the Seattle University School of Theology and Ministry at the
time. I remember her saying over and over again to me in her sermon:
“It’s not about you.” Pastoral leadership is servant
leadership. No one should exercise it primarily for their own
benefit. We pastors aren’t supposed to be doing it for our benefit.
We’re supposed to be doing it for the benefit of the people we
pastor and to spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ, not the Gospel of
Pastor So and So.
Most every kind of leadership should be servant leadership. The
people are always more important than the leader. Some of you are in
positions of leadership of one kind or another. Audry leads 4H
groups. John, Jesse, Tom, Dick, and Elsie make up the Admin Board of
this church. They are leaders here. The principles of servant
leadership apply to them as much as they apply to me. Anyone in any
position of leadership needs constantly to remind themselves of what
Phyllis said to me in that ordination service: “It’s not about
you.” The teachers of the law and the Pharisees in our passage from
Matthew thought it was about them. They were wrong. The leaders Micah
had condemned more than 700 years earlier thought it was about them
too. They too were wrong.
True leadership is servant leadership. It is leadership for the
benefit of the led. That’s how Jesus led. None of us will ever do
it as well as he did, but he can be our model and our guide. Jesus
led the people of his day, especially the poor and oppressed people
(and that was nearly everyone) to an understanding that they are
God’s beloved. That they deserve better. That God wants them freed
from poverty and oppression. Jesus’ leadership got him crucified.
Servant leadership often has opponents, sometimes vigorous and even
violent opponents. That is does doesn’t change the leader’s call.
Serve your people not yourself. That’s the servant part of servant
leadership.
Now, of course there’s another word in the phrase servant
leadership, namely of course the word leadership. See, a servant
leader is not just a servant. She is also a leader. That’s why
servant leaders often get sideways with some of the people they are
leading. I’ll have more to say about that aspect of servant
leadership next week. Stay tuned. Amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment